In tough times, we need an honest, trustworthy and transparent government. Mr. Harper and the Conservatives have consistently fallen short on this count, making honesty an expendable virtue more than a few times in the past several years.
Conservatives often speak of having respect for law and order, an issue that resonates with all Canadians and crosses party lines. Why, then, did Mr. Harper choose to ignore the police report on the long-gun registry, which clearly describes the registry as a crucial weapon in fighting crime and gang violence?
When the Tories promised to spend billions building new prisons, Stockwell Day was asked about the value of such an investment, given that crime rates are declining. He answered by describing a phantom crime wave - one that had not been documented anywhere but, he insisted, did indeed exist.
On the census, Maxime Bernier suggested his office had received thousands of complaints about the purported invasiveness of the mandatory long-form survey; but when asked to produce evidence of such complaints, he couldn’t deliver the goods.
More recently, and most disturbingly, Bev Oda thought it perfectly acceptable to alter the intended meaning of a legal document by 180 degrees after it had been signed. Most Canadians know that if they did such a thing while on the job, they would be out of one. Mr. Harper stood by her, effectively condoning such an act.
This dishonesty transcends the kind of white lies that people expect of politicians; it suggests hostility toward the truth. Indeed, in some of the government’s stranger moments, the Conservatives appear to have lost touch with reality altogether, blinded by ideology while caught in their own spin cycle. Witness their response to being the first government in Canadian history to be found in contempt of Parliament. To the Tories, this was a mere difference of opinion. The Globe endorsement made no mention of that.
To me, this election goes beyond ideology: it’s about trust. The very fact that Mr. Harper and his entourage could behave in such a dishonest manner and still get The Globe’s endorsement is an indication of how cynical we've become about our political process under this government.
The Globe’s endorsement correctly pointed out that Canada will face serious challenges in the years ahead. Like many Canadians, I’m convinced that Stephen Harper and the Conservative Party are not up to the job. My alternative endorsement echoes the now-famous one by Newfoundland and Labrador's former premier, Danny Williams, during the last election: Anything But Conservative. Both Michael Ignatieff and Jack Layton have given us far more reason to believe they are trustworthy, honest leaders who have a grip on the reality Canadians face.
Showing posts with label summary HarperGovernment. Show all posts
Showing posts with label summary HarperGovernment. Show all posts
Sunday, 1 May 2011
Anyone but Harper: a dissenting endorsement
Anyone but Harper: a dissenting endorsement
Friday, 25 March 2011
Looking back at the 40th Parliament
The Globe and Mail looks back at the biggest headlines from the 40th Parliament.
Wednesday, 16 March 2011
Letter to the Globe and Mail, March 12
Re Push To Ban Head Hits On The Ice Heats Up (March 11): For a guy who seems to have no clue how much his new jets or new prisons will really cost, has four of his top fundraisers facing possible fines or even jail time over alleged election financing irregularities, and who needs to prepare for possible contempt of Parliament charges, I thought it was damned decent of Stephen Harper to take time out of his day to tell the NHL’s Gary Bettman to get his house in order.
Bruce Mason, Etobicoke, Ont.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
